Am I presenting a straw man of O'Reilly's views?

 Fox News covers contraception as is required by New York law (and most other states). Therefore according O'Reilly's logic, he is paying for all the women at Fox News, New York, married and unmarried, to have sex.

It is hard to believe that Jesus believes that every married or unmarried woman who uses contraceptive birth control pills that are connected to an insurance mandate is being paid to have sex.

Am I presenting a straw man of O'Reily's views?